No Hillary For President in 2008 Forum/Discussion Board
Sponsored Links
SuggestionsHave a forum you want to see here or any other suggestions for this Hillary Clinton Forum? Please post your questions, comments, and suggestions here!
Fri, 07/10/2009 - 12:39pm
With the level of violence [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. and the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. for a level of autonomy that borders on independence, can we finally dispense with the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. that the 2007 "surge" in Iraq was a success?
The surge had two main goals. The first goal was to bring the level of violence down by increasing U.S. force levels in key areas, forging a tactical alliance with cooperative Sunni groups, and shifting to a counterinsurgency strategy that emphasized population protection. This aspect of the surge succeeded, though it is still hard to know how much of the progress was due to increased force levels and improved tactics and how much was due to other developments, such as the prior "ethnic cleansing" that had separated the contending groups.
The second and equally important goal was to promote political reconciliation among the competing factions in Iraq. This goal was not achieved, and the consequences of that failure are increasingly apparent. What lies ahead is a long-delayed test of strength between the various contending groups, until a new formula for allocating political power emerges. That formula has been missing since before the United States invaded -- that is, Washington never had a plausible plan for reconstructing a workable Iraqi state once it dismantled Saddam's regime -- and it will be up to the Iraqi people to work it out amongst themselves. It won’t be pretty.
With the passage of time, the "surge" should be seen as a well-intentioned attempt to staunch the violence temporarily and let President Bush hand the problem off to his successor. Hawks will undoubtedly try to pin the blame on Obama by claiming that we were (finally) winning by the time Bush left office, in the hope that Americans have forgotten the strategic objectives that the "surge" was supposed to achieve. It's a bogus argument, but what would you expect from the folks who got us in there in the first place?
JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images
[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Hillary For President Forum For Free. Sponsored Links:
No Hillary Clinton For President Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Hillary Clinton Discussion Board at NoHillaryForPresident.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not No Hillary For President. No Hillary For President does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the No Hillary For President Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of No Hillary For President or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. No Hillary Clinton For President does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. No Hillary Clinton For President merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on this site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads based on your visit to this site and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.