Hillary Clinton Draws First "Mud" With Barak Obama - NO Hillary Clinton For President

WiseOne · #1 02.23.2007

[ WASHINGTON, Feb. 22 — After weeks of watching in frustration as Senator Barack Obama presented himself as a fresh face gliding above partisan politics, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has drawn Mr. Obama onto a muddy political field, engaging him in a back-and-forth that recalls the kind of Washington bickering Mr. Obama has decried.

Mrs. Clinton’s effort to identify Mr. Obama with an attack made by one of his chief Hollywood supporters was widely viewed among Democrats as carrying some cost to Mrs. Clinton. The remarks at the heart of the dispute, by David Geffen, the Hollywood executive who was once a big fund-raiser for the Clintons, were a sharp reminder of Clinton family history that has led some Democrats to believe Mrs. Clinton cannot win a general election. ]

Read More Here >> New York Times

WiseOne's Comments -- This is only the beginning, black or no black...Hillary will stomp Barak Obama's face into the mud and guffaw in private. You have only witnessed the first draw, much more to come...Just MHO.

jcscuba · #2 02.23.2007

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.

Clixk here watch and listen to these whack jobs and ask what do they have in common with people interested in the future of America. The little speeches come at the end, but it's worth it!

Herb Schaffler · #3 02.23.2007

I'm hoping to see the real Hillary come out, which it very well might the more criticism that is leveled at her. I hope more and more Democrats become more convinced she can't win a general election and end up not nominating her. I don't want her to win the nomination because I believe she is devious enough to somehow pull off a victory.

jcscuba · #4 02.23.2007

I think you are on the money Herb. The more she is exposed she will unravel or really show the ice queen that she is. I don't want her to get the nomination either, problem is that Obama is actually to the left of Hillary and really scarier when he finally starts laying out believable policy. I guy I could never stand, Joe Biden, would do a better job than both of them.

A tribute to the broom rider:
[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.

Herb Schaffler · #5 02.23.2007

I think on domestic policy, there really isn't any difference between Hillary, Obama, and Edwards. They're all socialists. I get the impression that Obama is honest, but I could be wrong. I think Edwards is a slick lawyer and slick politician. I believe Hillary is the worst of the three because as well as being a socialist, she's a crook and a sleezy politician.

jcscuba · #6 02.23.2007

I agree with you again Herb with the exception that from what I've read, Obama is even more of a Socialist if that's possible. This is all such a joke, by the time it's actually time to vote the electorate will have become so sick of all of these people. We need somebody that is a demonstrated leader, yea he/she will have baggage, but they must not be as polarizing as Hillary. That's why I wouldn't vote for Newt, I think the guy is a genius and gave us all the years of growth that Clintonian Kling On's talk about. I'm for Rudy, hope he lays low and let all these has beens, never will be and posers flame out.

Herb Schaffler · #7 02.26.2007

Of all the major contenders, I'm also for Rudy. He comes closest to my libertarian leanings and I believe he would run the best campaign against Hillary if she's the one the Democrats nominate. The one I'm supporting now is Ron Paul, but alas, I don't think he will go that far. He will be taking part in the first of the Republican debates, which will aquaint the public with libertarian ideas that contradict the statist viewpoints of the major candidates of both parties.

Gangstamike · #8 03.03.2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herb Schaffler

Of all the major contenders, I'm also for Rudy. He comes closest to my libertarian leanings and I believe he would run the best campaign against Hillary if she's the one the Democrats nominate. The one I'm supporting now is Ron Paul, but alas, I don't think he will go that far. He will be taking part in the first of the Republican debates, which will aquaint the public with libertarian ideas that contradict the statist viewpoints of the major candidates of both parties.

Well herb i think you can rest assured that hillary probably won't make it too far. Not many if any candidates even attempted to trip her up.

PINWIZDE · #9 6 Days Ago

Barak and Hillary berating each other, Republicans voting for Hillary and John McCain, and the real loser, PLEASE STAND UP - THE AMERICAN VOTER! Washington already planning a
surprise, 2000 majority vote did not count, 2004 majority vote did not count, and 2008
majority vote will not count again! The NEXT PRESIDENT will be, not what the majority wants, but what Washington wants? America boycott the polls in 2008.. WRITE-IN your candidate for PRESIDENT, disrupt the Washington PLAN!

Corvair · #10 4 Days Ago

Quote:

Originally Posted by PINWIZDE

...2004 majority vote did not count...

Well, this certainly is news.