A Clinton Administration Would Be Corrupt?

[NoHitlery]

Say it ain't so......what in their past leads us to believe that they wouldn't be the most honest forthright people in Washington [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.

At least 42% of the voters are concerned. Dust off the ole Impeachment buttons!

[Mac]

"what in the past"?
"We are the President" was loud and clear.

[nohil-billy]

Mr. Milbank appears to be a Hillary fan, or at least a liberal. He seems to see no problem with negative numbers as high as the broom rider has so long as the positives are higher. He and his ilk are the same people who consider 30% opposed to George Bush a mandate.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. You can't talk to these people, you can't reason with these people, and you can't deal with these people!!!

[NoHitlery]

Originally Posted by Mac

"what in the past"?
"We are the President" was loud and clear.

I think nohil-billy misunderstood your reply Mac. "We are the President" came through loud and clear to me.

[Syz]

Hillary and Pelosi--where are the women role models for our young women today? I guess they're squirreled away in the silent minds of The National Organization of Women. Hillary and Pelosi would represent themselves correctly if they both wore crowns and T-shirts with a slash going through "The Bomber Cartoon".

Call Gonzalez and ask him to get busy going after Pelosi and Murtha for war crimes for extorting congressional votes for a financial "Time Line" so our enemies can kill our fighting men and the Iraqi citizens with more vim and vigor until their killing time line has been met. SUPPORT BUSH WITH DEMANDS OF A VETO?

Clearly Hillary, Pelosi and her congress have chosen "tyranny" as our contribution to the Iraqi citizens and worse, they represented themselves to our enemies as Americans with their acts of Treason.

[Herb Schaffler]

Obama is now 5 points below Hillary in the latest Rasmussan poll. Interestingly, Edwards is the strongest candidate when matched up against Republicans. He was about 8 points ahead of Giuliani, the Republicans strongest candidate whereas Guiliani is 1 point above Hillary. Maybe the Democrats will take that into consideration and pick Edwards who stands a better chance of winning the general election, although I don't care much for him either with his support for socialized medicine, but at least he's not Hillary.

[nohil-billy]

NH, my last post was directed solely at the author of the piece in your link, Dana Milbank. In the first paragraph of his column he took a cheap shot at Fox News and then proceeded to deride the findings of Judicial Watch and dismiss them, and the findings, as inconsequential. Imagine any Republican running with those kind of negative numbers and then imagine how Mr. Milbank's article would read.

I'm sorry if I got off subject, but I believe that while we need to expose the broom rider for what she is, we also need to expose her band of flying monkeys that do her bidding. This obviously includes Mr. Milbank.