Kathleen Willey suspects Clintons murdered husband

[nomoreclintons]

Kathleen Willey suspects Clintons murdered husband
New book details evidence of 'smear' campaign orchestrated by Hillary

In a new book alleging a campaign of slander and intimidation orchestrated chiefly by Hillary Clinton, Kathleen Willey points a finger of suspicion at the former first couple for the death of her husband, who was believed to have killed himself.

Willey, who claims she was groped by President Clinton in the White House, acknowledged in an interview with WND today that she stands by the speculation she poses about her husband's demise in "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ," set for release this week by [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. partner.
Asked if she suspects her husband Ed, a lawyer and son of a prominent Virginia lawmaker, was murdered, Willey replied, "Most definitely."

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.

[WiseOne]

That doesn't surprise me at all...people who disagree with the Clinton's seemingly drop dead all over the place...and most are called "suicides" and such. It staggers the mind to see what the Clinton's do and get away with and how Hillary can keep such high poll numbers! Sigh.

[Syz]

Kudos to Giuliani for infuriating the Clintons by making Hillary out the fool she is. Note the severity of the response from both of them regarding those who put her in her place during the last debate. If they would react as Giuliani stated: "if Hillary thinks answering a question about the illigal driver's license voter fraud is a "gotcha", then she's not qualified to handle terrorism. My God, get this couple in white coats!

I've been saying over and over how Hillary abused the women in Bill's life so the Kathleen Willey isn't a suspicion to me. I accept it as fact and put it in the same file as all the mafia hits from this twosome.

I'm still laughing at Bill stepping to the mike to announcing his dear Hillary had been "swift boated by the nasty debate team. Lord knows, Bill Clinton should know about "swift boating Hillary". they've both done it to each other throughout their marriage.

Funny, when Bill swift boats Hillary, she takes his side by abusing the same women he abused by calling them liars when she knew they weren't. Now, we hear she kept track of all these women for the purpose of blackmailing them, not as an offense by Bill.

Those two are like sexual sadists who salivate over who can generate the most hatred from the citizens and still get the main fools to vote Bill in for a third term, so why should any of us think their Mafia solutions are not part of the sociopath make up of these two.

Oddly enough, I don't need a Judge and Jury to tell me the Clintons are all they have been represented to be. I've seen years of it and their personalities and actions prove it so I'm now the Jury and I proclaim them "GUILTY AS CHARGED" and the lawyers can take a you know what in this regard.

No more are they going to get the "fair and balanced BS" as a gift from the media while we suffer the consequences of this vile couple. The next thing out of their mouths will be "Kathleen Willey" is jealous or some such idiocy. NOT THIS TIME THEY DON'T. These are two RATS who refused to go down with the ship, but it's now clear, they made sure everyone else did.

[Herb Schaffler]

I can hear the spin already from the Clinton machine. They will say that Kathleen is delusional and paranoid and they will point out how the publisher of their book is a publisher famous for printing anti-Clinton books. So what! Being a publisher that prints anti-Clinton books doesn't mean that everything in this book isn't true.

[Brickman]

Originally Posted by WiseOne

That doesn't surprise me at all...people who disagree with the Clinton's seemingly drop dead all over the place...and most are called "suicides" and such. It staggers the mind to see what the Clinton's do and get away with and how Hillary can keep such high poll numbers! Sigh.

If I was Dick Morris I would sleep with one eye open at all times. With a large contingent of body guards.


Some of the articles he writes about them and the interviews he gives on TV about them have to got to real piss them off.

[Herb Schaffler]

"If I was Dick Morris I would sleep with one eye open at all times. With a large contingent of body guards."


"Some of the articles he writes about them and the interviews he gives on TV about them have to got to real piss them off."

Brickman, what are some of the things he's been saying about the Clintons on televison and what networks has he been saying these things?

[Brickman]

Originally Posted by Herb Schaffler

Brickman, what are some of the things he's been saying about the Clintons on televison and what networks has he been saying these things?

I get regular emails from him BLASTING Hil and Bill..............

THE CLINTON CONUNDRUM: BILL'S DEFENSE UNDERMINES HILLARY'S CANDIDACY

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on FoxNews.com on November 9, 2007.

Printer-Friendly Version

During the Bill Clinton presidency, it became obvious that the president and the first lady were locked in a zero sum game of perception. The stronger people perceived her, the weaker they felt he was. Early in his tenure, news stories were rife about Hillary’s extraordinary influence on appointments, policy and political strategy. Each of these leaks sapped confidence in Bill Clinton’s strength and led to a drop in his ratings.

The solution was to exile Hillary from the White House. She stopped attending strategy meetings, no longer had a direct or public role in policy formulation and redoubled her schedule of foreign travel and writing.

Now, as Hillary runs for president and Bill speaks out on her behalf, the Clintons’ zero sum conundrum has returned. His stout defense of his wife saps her credibility and raises doubts about her potential stre ngth as a president. With his every speech and utterance, the question grows: Can she stand up for herself or does she need to hide behind her husband?

The stereotype of the strong man standing up for his besieged wife is deeply ingrained in our psyche. But even as it feeds admiration for his chivalry, it also undermines her reputation for strength and independence.

Such criticism is potentially lethal for a woman candidate, particularly one seeking the presidency of a nation at war with a global matrix of terrorists. Hillary has been at great pains to build up her reputation for toughness, boasting that she will “deck” her opponents and that she is able to defeat the “vast right wing conspiracy.” OK. So why is her husband fighting her fights for her?

Bill Clinton is way too far out there for Hillary’s good. He needs to take the same kind of slow boat to China that he sent her on during his White House years — in her case, to address the global conference on women’s rights in Beijing.

Hillary’s debate performance is spawning layers of negatives. First, of course, people realize that she is ducking issues and dancing around making commitments. Her refusal to be pinned down was evident under Tim Russert’s skilled questioning.

But her protests, and those of her husband, against Russert’s questions and the tendency of her male opponents to pile on , led to a sense that she may be too weak to be president. After all, the men who run Al Qaeda, Iran, Russia and China have a tendency to pile on also.

Finally, with Bill rushing to her defense, backing her on the release of White House papers, taking responsibility for the health care debacle of 1993 to 1994 and accusing Russet of bias, comes the question of whether she is, in fact, strong enough to face the Republicans in the general election.

None of these ruminations are good for Hillary’s candidacy.

It seems that voters allocate a certain quantum of strength to a married couple, to be divided between them as their personalities and circumstances dictate. A strong wife implies a weak husband and vice versa. This social habit of thought carries over into politics and casts a shadow over our first married political couple since the Roosevelts.

Would we expect Denis Thatcher to speak up for Maggie? What would we think if he berated the men of the Argentine Junta for piling on against his wife? How would we respond if he accused the BBC of bias against his Prime Minister/wife?

The fact that Bill has been president just makes his intervention the more obvious and politically costly. Here we have not only a husband standing up for his woman, but a former president helping his ingénue wife in her efforts to fend for herself. The stereotype is not appealing and undermines Hillary’s candidacy.

Bill needs to go home and get a life.

_________________________________
PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY WHO MAY BE INTERESTED IN DICKMORRISREPORTS!

THANK YOU!

[nohil-billy]

Like street gangs who force new members to commit felonies as part of the initiation ritual to keep them from snitching on the gang while proving their loyalty, I feel that most of the characters in the Clinton White House were somewhat dirty and must now maintain their silence lest they also be taken down. It's the one's who were clean that got taken out, (Vince Foster, Mike Brown) not the one's that had the Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads.

Who knows what Dick Morris and Robert Reich actually know but cannot tell? How much of what George Snuffalupagus knows would be the "lead story" if it were a Republican, and old George wasn't going down with 'em?

While I'm starting to believe that the Clintons are that bad, I can't believe for a second that all of those people in his cabinet sat idly by while the Clintons disposed of their detractors like Idi Amin did over a main course of monkey brains.

It's no wonder Hillary is against water boarding.

[Syz]

Enjoyed the above posts--I always thought we should ask the likes of a John Gotti the value of torture. We need to water board the Congress and maybe we'd get some truth.

Considering Hillary has never run a household and all her speeches are directed toward socialism for this nation, it would follow that women 18/50 are only voting for a woman. This liberal reasoning is now followed by black males voting for Hillary instead of Obama, What's wrong with this picture? The blacks continue the sabotage of their race as the women continue to sabotage their gender to maintain their victimhood. I'm beginning to see the sabotage of Hillary by Bill. I'll say it again--he's not chivalrous and won't take second position. He's just begun his mate-pretense support of her. This is where the weenie/slick part of Clinton shines.

Savage often remarks that Liberalism is a mental Disorder and the above lack of brain cells proves it.

[nohil-billy]

From what I heard, Slick made his move on Kathleen Willey by fondling her breast while speaking to her.

Not too long ago, a trial wrapped up in Platte County, Missouri where a man was tried for murdering his best friend and then raping his wife. I can't imagine how she felt during that ordeal. I imagine Kathleen Willey feeling the exact same way.