Hillary's Cackle May Give Opponents Last Laugh

[WiseOne]

They call it the Clinton cackle. It comes out of the blue, lasts a few seconds and leaves those who witnessed it wondering if they have missed a joke. Hillary Clinton's deployment of the full belly laugh is the latest weapon used by the leading Democratic presidential candidate when she is being pummelled by reporters or rivals.
Friends say the cackle is her way of deflecting aggressive questioning. It may also be a sign of nervousness over Iowa, where she is now running second to Barak Obama, according to one weekend poll.

Read More Here >> The Independent



WiseOne's Comments, I disagree, I think Hillary will have the last laugh as she is, indeed, fooling the whole country already and she MOST LIKELY will be the nominee, IMHO

[Corvair]

This very well could be a (slightly) less histrionic version of the Howard Dean "scream." I mean, it's been over a week and people are still talking about it.

Jon Stewart had a very funny bit on it:

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.

[nohil-billy]

Or maybe it's a signal to launch her flying monkeys.

[Syz]

I'm waiting for Hillarys first warm presentation where I don't want to smack her off the stage-or the words "My fellow countrymen" something Presidential, endearing, kind, thought provoking, caring, concern for country, love of our culture, our strength from within. Has someone seen a sense of humor I have missed (other than Monica of course)?

[Herb Schaffler]

Originally Posted by Syz

I'm waiting for Hillarys first warm presentation where I don't want to smack her off the stage-or the words "My fellow countrymen" something Presidential, endearing, kind, thought provoking, caring, concern for country, love of our culture, our strength from within. Has someone seen a sense of humor I have missed (other than Monica of course)?

Sys, she can't come across as warm because she's a phony. She's all about herself.

[fredflinstoned]

Its artificial,she cackles because she and her supporters have read past comments on how nasty and insulting she was towards Rumsfeild,little does she know that the true sovereigns are much smarter than that.
We all know that it was she that controlled the 8 years that her husband was in office,one only needs to look at the legislation that was passed durring Bills tenor to realise that far extending and reaches of government intrusion into the private and social lives of individuals was one sided against men.
As well as to hinder and destroy the rights of the States.
We can see it clearly in the laws that were passed that alloowed the States to revoke ones drivers license for failure to pay a government created debt.
We realise it when the government assumend it was within their authority to obtain jurisdiction over natural sovereigns born free and not made free by the Federal government under the 14th amendment.
We realise it by the fact that citizanship is merely a substitute of trickery and deception that converts ones right of personal sovereignty into a citizan status,in which is also nothing more than a substitute word for subject of government.
I am neither a citizan,nor a resident because excepting such a status one surrenders their right of sovereignty granted in 1783 under the Paris peace treaty,if your not familuar with the treaty then go and read it.
King George of Great Britain relinquished his claims of being the sole sovereign of the people of the United States,and all of their descendants,and those who were once his subjects became a sovereign in their own right.
One is not required to become a citizan,or any other status defined by the government if they so choose so as long as they were born and not naturalised in the United States.
Such a requirement would amount to a conversion which would be legal grounds for a lawsuite in which limited immunity would not apply.
It isn't by circumstance that the government forced the States under Federal appropriations blackmail to adhere to the Federal government.
Do as we say or we'll withold Federal money allocations and distribute the monies to the States that obey.
While there is no requirement of the States to participate failure to create laws according to the Federal governments guidelines will cause a forfeit of such allocations to the States.
If you want more of this type of government control then vote for Hillary,the fact remains that things would only get worse if she was to be elected as president.
'm not bias I can confidently vote for a female,or a black person man,or female,or any other person so as long as I beleive that their intrest is truely in the best intrest of the people,based solely upon the public opinion,anything less than results in a government running amock trampling on the rights and the protections of the Sovereign,not the collective whole sovereignity that was later added to the Black's law dictionary but the original definition that is still included but seldome used,because the government fears that the people may be a little wiser than they anticipated.
This is one person that wont fall for the same old political battles fighting for the presidency.l
Keep their health care,as they cannot manage their own budget rather than to also manage health issues of the people,keep their political veiws to themselves regarding abortions,that is of judicial matters.l
If she be a fine candidate then tell me why durring her husbands office of governor of Arkansas they couldn't pass any sensible laws regarding safety issues in automobiles operated under the commerce clause?
They have some of the worst laws to protect the people alomg with some 33 other States,and beleive it or not South Carolins,Georgia,North Carolins are only three of 16 States that attempt to protect the innocent.

[Syz]

Thanks Freddy for a great presentation. I'll have to read it over again, lots of factual info and no theories--and Herb LoL-the woman from hell--in dictionary under: Pusillanimus, weak, schizophrenia, schlemiel, shyster (I leave the spelling to you) but the definitions are perfection.

My question:

Considering the Clintons never owned a home of their own, never handled a business and left office broke to the point where friends purchased their N.Y. home for them, suddenly the Messers Clinton(no sense in pretending Bill isn't getting a third term here) come up with 80 million donated to them for no expertise, other than impeachment as their record. There isn't a bank that wouldn't throw them out the door as a bad risk SOOOO, other than "favor friends" while in Arkansas and D.C. footing their bills, why aren't the Republicans presenting us with how far the financial arms of Soros reaches?? Hell, we all know what the Clintons are (similar to Saddam's WMD, we all know he had 'em, the only question has always been "what did he do with them" so the Clinton question is only: How much money has Soros given while convoluting allowable finances through third parties to this thieving dead beat couple? They have no credibility or abilities and this is a proven fact, so who is it that wants them in office? Soros alone can't be the main pimp here. There isn't a man or women I know who are going to vote for them and we all know the polls are easily fixed by questions asked so what's the behind the scenes real story? What little foreign devils are enjoined with the liberal fanatics?

I am noticing a few Republicans hitting against the Marxist hopefuls, but why so few when there is so much to hit them with? I realize the Republicans have their own financial deeds to hide, but they're insignificant against the liberal frenzy-

Congress has been hitting us with the insistance we cater to illegal immigrants, insist that we begin a Federal Health program by the chic vote, insistant that we begin the Fairness Doctrine by taking up valuable voting time over Rush Limbaugh and the shill media refuses to be a responsible informant.--Like I have said before: WHAT A STENCH!