46% In Zogby Poll Say They Would NEVER vote for Hillary - NO Hillary Clinton For President

NoHitlery · #1 03.26.2007

A national poll of likely voters by independent pollster John Zogby found that nearly half (46 percent) said they couldn't vote for the former first lady under any circumstances. That is certainly a huge portion of the American electorate, which will no doubt feed growing doubts in her party about the New York senator's electability. But another number was even more disturbing to senior advisers in her campaign.

[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.

Herb Schaffler · #2 03.26.2007

That means she would have to get 95% of the remaining 54% to get 51% of the vote. Democrats, take note of that and vote for somebody else for your nominee.

In other news, Newsmax reports that last week she hinted that she would appoint her husband to the post of Secretary General of the UN. Imagine, Hillary running the country and Bill running the world.

WiseOne · #3 03.26.2007

Quote:

Imagine, Hillary running the country and Bill running the world.

Only God could help us then. That thought gives me some serious, bone-chilling shivers there. I pray that poll is right and nothing happens to stop the momentum against her before the primaries...I'm SURE she's out hunting dirt on the rest right now for sure...so be on the lookout for her to pull something out of her long, pointy hat before long!

Herb Schaffler · #4 03.27.2007

A new Rasmussan Poll shows McCain would defeat Hillary 48 to 41, but would tie Obama 44 to 44. I'm sure the margin would be even greater for Guiliani against Hillary. Why do the Democrats still support Hillary? Do they want to commit suicide?

Corvair · #5 03.27.2007

Hang on now, guys. Let's not let the hyperbole get out of control here.

First of all, the UN does not run the world, by a long shot. There are many people who worship the UN and think it is infallible, but it really isn't much more than a big, bumbling, inept, major annoyance. (Oh, I forgot "corrupt", too.)

Secondly, the president of the United States does not appoint the Secretary General of the UN. The president appoints the United States ambassador to the UN, but not the Secretary General.

NoHitlery · #6 03.27.2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corvair

Hang on now, guys. Let's not let the hyperbole get out of control here.

First of all, the UN does not run the world, by a long shot. There are many people who worship the UN and think it is infallible, but it really isn't much more than a big, bumbling, inept, major annoyance. (Oh, I forgot "corrupt", too.)

Secondly, the president of the United States does not appoint the Secretary General of the UN. The president appoints the United States ambassador to the UN, but not the Secretary General.

Good Points Corvair: That being said with Madame Woo in the White House and Slick Willy as Ambassador to the U.N. and a Democratically held House and Senate do the sounds of joining the World Court bother you? How about a UN Carbon Tax? Slick would be in the middle of all of it pushing the Socialist/Marxist agenda to bring America down. I say get the U.N out of the US. It a useless organization that passes resolutions that basically the U.S.A. is left to enforse. I say let it go the way of the league of nations!

Corvair · #7 03.27.2007

Yes, if the Witch were to make it to the White House and BJ to the UN, it would be a non-stop spectacle of Keystone Cops ineptitude and an endless spewing of meaningless yapping, all day every day, sort of like a bullsh*t tag team. (Was there ever a human being who liked the sound of his own voice the way BJ does?) It would be too much for the average person to take.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herb Schaffler

A new Rasmussan Poll shows McCain would defeat Hillary 48 to 41, but would tie Obama 44 to 44. I'm sure the margin would be even greater for Guiliani against Hillary. Why do the Democrats still support Hillary? Do they want to commit suicide?

That's the question, isn't it? Why does anyone support this flea bag? It's a mystery...

Herb Schaffler · #8 03.27.2007

Anybody that's interested, there is an active blog going on now about Hillary at reason.com hit and run section. I'm in there as Rattlesnake Jake.

Herb Schaffler · #9 03.28.2007

A new Harris Poll shows that 50% of the public does not intend to vote for the witch. They find her too polarizing and over 40% don't agree with her politics. The poll found that 45% of women don't plan to vote for her and even more that 20% of Democrats plan to not vote for her. The witch might as well call it quits and save herself more humiliation. The Democrats need to wise up and vote for somebody else. Another poll found that of Obama supporters, Edwards was the second choice of the majority and among Edwards supporters, Obama was the second choice. I wish Edwards would drop out and maybe Obama could overtake Hillary. My concern is that Airhead Gore will enter the race. Although I would love to see him knock out Hillary, then we would need to create a "nogoreforpresident" site. My feelings are just about as negative for him as they are for Hillary.

The face shows I don't know whether to laugh or cry, laugh about Hillary's slide or cry about a potential Gore run.

Gangstamike · #10 03.28.2007

Only A Complete And Total ####### Would Vote For Hellary.