Hillary Could Not Stand Up To The World's Giants

[WiseOne]

[ India, China and Russia account for 40 per cent of the world’s population, a fifth of its economy and more than half of its nuclear warheads. Now they appear to be forming a partnership to challenge the US-dominated world order that has prevailed since the end of the Cold War.

Foreign ministers from the three emerging giants met in Delhi yesterday to discuss ways to build a more democratic “multipolar world”.

It was the second such meeting in the past two years and came after an unprecedented meeting between their respective leaders, Manmohan Singh, Hu Jintao and Vladimir Putin, during the G8 summit in St Petersburg in July. ]

Read More Here >> Times Online

WiseOne's Comments -- With the world's leaders coming together against the United States, the thought of electing Hillary Clinton to represent us against them turns my stomach. This woman does, indeed, have some "balls", but she can't hold up to pressure like that, what would she do in this situation, ask yourself BEFORE you vote for this woman...Just MHO.

[jcscuba]

How will Hillary change her stance on the war after this recent poll? The MSM and our politicians have been asking the wrong questions all the time. A very well known polling service shows what Americans really believe about the War in Iraq. This will shock those of you who have been lulled to sleep by "our leaders"


POLL: AMERICANS 'WANT TO WIN IN IRAQ'
Tue Feb 20 2007 16:21:32 ET

In the wake of the U.S. House of Representatives passing a resolution that amounts to a vote of no confidence in the Bush administration's policies in Iraq, a new national survey by Alexandria, VA-based Public Opinion Strategies (POS) shows the American people may have some different ideas from their elected leaders on this issue.

The survey was conducted nationwide February 5-7 among a bi-partisan, cross-section of 800 registered voters. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percent. The survey was commissioned by The Moriah Group, a Chattanooga-based strategic communications and public affairs firm.

The survey shows Americans want to win in Iraq, and that they understand Iraq is the central point in the war against terrorism and they can support a U.S. strategy aimed at achieving victory, said Neil Newhouse, a partner in POS. The idea of pulling back from Iraq is not where the majority of Americans are.


By a 53 percent - 46 percent margin, respondents surveyed said that Democrats are going too far, too fast in pressing the President to withdraw troops from Iraq.

By identical 57 percent - 41 percent margins, voters agreed with these statements: I support finishing the job in Iraq, that is, keeping the troops there until the Iraqi government can maintain control and provide security and the Iraqi war is a key part of the global war on terrorism.

Also, by a 56 percent - 43 percent margin, voters agreed that even if they have concerns about his war policies, Americans should stand behind the President in Iraq because we are at war.

While the survey shows voters believe (60 percent- 34 percent) that Iraq will never become a stable democracy, they still disagree that victory in Iraq (creating a young, but stable democracy and reducing the threat of terrorism at home) is no longer possible. Fifty-three percent say it's still possible, while 43 percent disagree.

By a wide 74 percent - 25 percent margin, voters disagree with the notion that "I don't really care what happens in Iraq after the U.S. leaves, I just want the troops brought home."

When asked which statement best describes their position on the Iraq War, voters are evenly divided (50 percent - 49 percent) between positions of "doing whatever it takes to restore order until the Iraqis can govern and provide security to their country," and positions that call for immediate withdrawal or a strict timetable.

27 percent said "the Iraq war is the front line in the battle against terrorism and our troops should stay there and do whatever it takes to restore order until the Iraqis can govern and provide security to their country."

23 percent said "while I don't agree that the U.S. should be in the war, our troops should stay there and do whatever it takes to restore order until the Iraqis can govern and provide security to their country."

32 percent said "whether Iraq is stable or not, the U.S. should set and hold to a strict timetable for withdrawing troops."

17 percent said "the U.S. should immediately withdraw its troops from Iraq."

The survey also found that voters thought it would hurt American prestige more to pull out of Iraq immediately (59 percent) than it would to stay there for the long term (35 percent). Public Opinion Strategies "scored the best win-loss record among the major polling and media firms in the 2004 election" and was named Pollster of the Year in 2002.

X X X X X

[WiseOne]

EXCELLENT stats, I hope this does wake some people up. I really don't think Americans understand how dire a situation we are in right now...we are in danger of losing ALL prestige throughout the entire world. God help us all if Hillary Clinton gets elected, it very well could be America's last hoorah.

[wealthkeeper]

Really I dont think Hillary has a chance
it just makes news

[WiseOne]

I disagree, I think Hillary has a very good chance of making it. She is quite devious enough to accomplish it, I believe. She is dead serious about running AND making it...

[Corvair]

Originally Posted by wealthkeeper

Really I dont think Hillary has a chance
it just makes news

This is how I feel as well. My best hunch is that this miserable shrew will meet the same fate as Howard Dean did in '04. Recall how he was the "inevitable" Democrat nominee, and then proceeded to win not a single primary. I just can't imagine what any thinking person sees in the empty bauble that is Hillary Clinton.

[WiseOne]

I doubt that. Hillary is like a chameleon and will change to meet the colors of the background and blend in. Howard Dean was (and still is) a flat goofball, but Hillary is going to make people (who can stop her, like you and I) think she is nothing and then pounce and surprise us all just like Bill Clinton did in 1992. Beware of Hillary and, for the love of all that is holy, NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THIS WOMAN.

[jcscuba]

In December, Senator [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ’s publisher rereleased “It Takes a Village” in a 10th-anniversary edition, but it flopped, selling only 6,000 copies, according to Nielsen BookScan, which tracks sales in most bookstores and online retailers. click below: A tribute to the broom rider
[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link.

[Corvair]

Originally Posted by WiseOne

I doubt that. Hillary is like a chameleon and will change to meet the colors of the background and blend in. Howard Dean was (and still is) a flat goofball, but Hillary is going to make people (who can stop her, like you and I) think she is nothing and then pounce and surprise us all just like Bill Clinton did in 1992. Beware of Hillary and, for the love of all that is holy, NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THIS WOMAN.

I'm not equating the personalities of Dean and Hillary --- only that the two of them were tagged "inevitable." I have the feeling (or is it just hope?) that Broom Hilda will crash and burn in the same fashion as Dean. As soon as people actually have the opportunity to cast a vote, she will be toast. That's my fondest wish, anyway.

Also, let's not forget that BJ never, ever would have been elected president if it hadn't been for Ross Perot siphoning off roughly 18% of the votes that most likely would have gone to George H.W. Bush. Bubba is nowhere near the 'brilliant politician' so many pundits believe him to be. He could not have been elected without a strong third party candidate to split the conservative vote.

[jcscuba]

The Broom Rider will self distruct!