Would Bill Clinton have been less of a disaster if he ran as Hillary?s co-president?

[WiseOne]

Like a terrible werewolf moon, Bill Clinton is shining again in his full brilliance. A new wave of commentary, from The New Yorker to Newsweek to The Wall Street Journal to The New York Times, has concluded that Bill's role in his wife's presidential campaign has mainly damaged both Hillary and his own legacy. Bill clumsily played the race card, they say. Bill doesn't understand new media. Bill is embittered and angry. Maybe Bill's role could have been entirely different. What if Hillary had placed Bill front and center in her campaign? What if the Clintons had run as equals--and offered what would effectively be a co-presidency--from the very start? Early in the campaign, Hillary's strategists had good reason to keep Bill away from center stage. With her clunky speaking style, Hillary suffered in direct comparison to her spouse's political magic--something made clear after the two spoke in succession at Coretta Scott King's February 2006 funeral. Hillary seemed a rusty Honda Accord to Bill's Maserati convertible.

Read More Here >> Against Hillary