July 23, 2008 Is Obama the 'Antiwar Candidate'? Two words of advice for the antiwar voter: Caveat emptor by Justin RaimondoNow that Barack Obama has pulled [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. from under John McCain's "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. " campaign theme, with the invaluable [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. of Iraqi Prime Minister [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , he's preparing the way for a surge of his own: an [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , to be precise. Averring that we need to put more troops in Afghanistan, whose U.S.-supported "president" functions as [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. than the mayor of Kabul, Obama is [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. next to as many uniforms as he can, hoping to establish his credentials as a plausible wartime president.
So, you thought we'd be rid of the endless "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. " once we got George W. Bush out of the White House, and ensconced a Democrat in his place? Well, think again, and get ready for an escalation of [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. – the one in Afghanistan, a much tougher and more intractable prospect than Iraq by a longshot.
The Obama/Democratic Party line on the Middle East, in a nutshell, amounts to this: the Bush administration, through some mysterious internal malfunction, allowed itself to be "diverted" from the task of pursuing al-Qaeda, which was based in Afghanistan, and instead went after Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi Ba'athists because, as Paul Wolfowitz said, "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ." The word "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. " – and any references, however oblique, to the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. played by foreign lobbyists in rushing us into war – never passes the candidate's lips. After all, that would be "divisive."
Aside from glossing over the history of our most recent involvement in the Middle East, however, Obama's [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. for more troops in the Afghan theater promises a disaster potentially far more serious than the one perpetrated by his predecessor in Iraq. At least Iraq, for all its horrific [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , was "doable." Afghanistan isn't. The Soviets discovered this, to their sorrow, in the 1980s, as did the Brits in 1842. Neither ever succeeded in subduing this proud and tough-minded people, as the British historian [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. pointed out in a 2001 [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. for the Telegraph: "Efforts to occupy and rule [Afghanistan] usually ended in disaster. But straightforward punitive expeditions … were successful on more than one occasion.
"It should be remembered that, in 1878, the British did succeed in bringing the Afghans to heel [with a punitive expedition]. Lord Roberts' march from 'Kabul to Kandahar' was one of [Queen] Victoria's most celebrated wars. The Russians, moreover, foolishly did not try to punish rogue Afghans, as Roberts did, but to rule the country. Since Afghanistan is ungovernable, the failure of their efforts was predictable.…
"America should not seek to change the regime, but simply to find and kill the terrorists. It should do so without pity."
The smoke was still rising from the World Trade Center and the Pentagon as Keegan's article saw print, and today the prospects of a "punitive expedition" are about as dim as the hope of establishing a Jeffersonian republic in that tortured terrain. The time for such an effort has long since [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. . Bush [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , and, unlike Hollywood, [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. . Bin Laden and his confreres have since spread far and wide, recruiting an entirely [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. of jihadists – with the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. of our own policymakers, who have given the terrorist icon [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. of grist for his mill.
U.S. efforts in Afghanistan have been marked by alternate bouts of [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. social engineering, often occurring simultaneously. I've lost count of the number of times we've "mistakenly" bombed a [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. or even the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , denied it, and then later on sheepishly [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. our error, attributing it to "the fog of war." This has happened so many times that President Hamid Karzai has [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. in public, his anger palpable. On the other hand, we've been busy on the do-gooder front, as if to make up for our deadly "errors," [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. and bringing the alleged benefits of "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. " to the mountainous land that time forgot. Yet this effort has not been welcomed. It has been stubbornly resisted by a proud and deeply religious [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , whose traditional mores and cultural history are so far removed from our own.
This sort of thing has been tried before – by [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , who tried to impose land-reform measures and gender equality at bayonet point. Obama, with his idealistic "yes-we-can"-ism, seems all too likely to reattempt it. Already he's pledged to commit more money and other economic assistance, as well as more troops, to Karzai's beleaguered and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. regime – which means more [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. thrown into a bottomless hole.
Furthermore, this well-meaning earnestness will boomerang in our faces, as the age-old customs of an inward-looking people are violated and the yoke of foreign rule is tightened. Out in the Afghan wilds, Kabul is just as far removed as Washington, at least figuratively, and the "country" of Afghanistan is largely a [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , a geographical rather than a political or national entity that is no more unified than, say, [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. . Tribes, clans, and sub-clans, [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ethnic and regional groups and sub-groups, all with their labyrinthine histories of conflict and collaboration – it's a chaotic and often stormy mix that can't be managed or "reformed." When the NATO commander in charge of the Afghan front reiterates the West's desire to impose "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ," one wonders what planet he's living on.
The re-invasion and occupation of Afghanistan will give President Obama a chance to highlight his hawkishness and prove himself to the War Party as a good and loyal servant. It will also allow the Democratic Party to refurbish its credentials as a tough-minded crew, ready, willing, and able to spill as much innocent blood as the GOP in establishing U.S. hegemony in the Middle East. This refurbishing, however, will be short-lived, because the Afghans will be no more receptive to Obama's charms than they were to Queen Victoria's civilizing mission and Yuri Andropov's "proletarian internationalism."
It isn't just Afghanistan, however, that provides a clue as to Obama's future development as a wartime president in the tradition of [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. : the appointment of [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. as his principal Middle East adviser is good news for the War Party, specifically for that crucial branch of it that specializes in promoting Israel's ambitions [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. America's national interests.
No matter which president Ross worked for, Democrat or Republican – and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. – his interventionist agenda and his sympathy for the interests of a certain Middle Eastern nation were no secret. His sympathy, too, for poor, persecuted [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. prompted him to [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. that convicted felon's defense fund. And he was [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. with Bill Kristol and the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. in agitating for war with Iraq.
In a future Obama administration, the so-called [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. will have their chief factotum in Ross, who is presumably up for a major role in the Obama administration – perhaps national security adviser, or even secretary of state. That is good news for the tiny yet influential Joe Lieberman wing of the Democratic Party, and very bad news indeed for Obama's anti-interventionist supporters, or even just ordinary war-weary Americans. As Leon Hadar [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. : "Another contingency of liberal hawks occupies positions of influence in Washington think-tanks, including the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution, where such scholar-practitioners as former U.S. ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk and Kenneth Pollack have been cheerleaders for the Iraq War and have approved of Bush's policies on Iran and Israel. In fact, one does not have to be a veteran political observer to predict Indyk, Pollack, and other experts on the Middle East, like former peace negotiator Dennis Ross, would probably play a major role in influencing the policy of a future Democratic administration. In that case, the Democratic Party activists who rallied against Joe Lieberman should not be surprised if Bush's Democratic successor ends up pursuing policies that might be described as neoconservatism with a smiling Democratic face."
Ross acted as a [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. for the government of then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak during the Clinton-era Oslo negotiations, poses as a "peacemaker," shamelessly promotes Israel's interests, and works for AIPAC and AIPAC-affiliated organizations yet strenuously [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. there's such a creature as the Israel lobby. He is virtually the living embodiment of business-as-usual insofar as U.S. foreign policy is concerned, and his closeness to Obama – the two stood [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. during the candidate's Mideast tour – bodes ill for the antiwar voter shopping around for a viable candidate.
This isn't "change" – it's the same old B.S., rooted in some pretty basic misconceptions. The idea that the U.S. can "solve" – permanently and decisively – the terrorism problem is an illusion ingrained, perhaps, in the American psyche, which is fond of applying metaphors like "get the job done" to complex realities barely comprehensible to the Western mind. It's as if the making of foreign policy were like plumbing, and it's merely a matter of "fixing" things that somehow got broken. That our own policies [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. this breakage in the first place, often directly, is almost never acknowledged, and when it is, the proposed "solution" is [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. to worsen rather than alleviate the original problem.
The mistakes of the past cannot be undone, but if we learn from them we can minimize the amount of "blowback" that continues to come at us from all directions. Alas, it appears that, no matter who wins the White House this November, a foreign policy made by those who have learned nothing and regret nothing will remain in place.
~ Justin Raimondo
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Hillary For President Forum For Free. Sponsored Links:
No Hillary Clinton For President Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Hillary Clinton Discussion Board at NoHillaryForPresident.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not No Hillary For President. No Hillary For President does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the No Hillary For President Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of No Hillary For President or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. No Hillary Clinton For President does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. No Hillary Clinton For President merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions. Privacy: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on this site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads based on your visit to this site and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.