No Hillary For President Forum/Message Board - Stop Hillary - Anti-Hillary Forum

World News & Politics - Political Discussion For Anti-Apathetic, Smart People  

Political Forum - A Forum For Political Junkies. Get Your Politics "Fix" Here! 


Go Back   NO Hillary Clinton For President - Forum > 2008 Political Race Contenders > 2008 Democrat Candidate Comparisons

No Hillary For President in 2008 Forum/Discussion Board
Sponsored Links
2008 Democrat Candidate Comparisons 2008 Democrat Presidential Candidates Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05.02.2008
Anti-Hillary Forum Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Age: 61
Posts: 1,298
Obama Holds Big Lead Over Clinton in NC

Zogby: Obama Holds Big Lead Over Clinton in NC


Friday, May 2, 2008 8:33 AM

Article Font Size

Five days before the important Democratic presidential primaries in North Carolina and Indiana, Barack Obama of Illinois enjoys a substantial lead in one state and remains tied with Hillary Clinton of New York in the other, a new Zogby daily tracking poll shows.
Obama leads by a 50% to 34% margin over Clinton in North Carolina, while the two are tied at 42% support each in Indiana.
The telephone surveys, conducted over two days, began on April 30 and were completed May 1. They comprise the first of Zogby’s daily tracking surveys that will continue until Tuesday. In North Carolina, 668 likely Democratic primary election voters were polled. The survey carries a margin of error of +/- 3.9 percentage points. In Indiana, 680 likely voting Democratic primary voters were surveyed. That poll carries a margin of error of +/- 3.8 percentage points
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove This Ad By Registering. Join Our Hillary For President Forum For Free. Sponsored Links:

  #2  
Old 05.02.2008
Anti-Hillary Forum Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Age: 61
Posts: 1,298
Divert, Distract, and Demonize
The War Party's strategy to sink Barack Obama by Justin RaimondoThe War Party has a reliable strategy when faced with a rising political figure who threatens their monopoly on American politics, one that is time-tested and invariably successful: when all else fails, they bring out the Smear Bund.
This is a term coined by [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , I believe, in the run-up to the outbreak of the Second World War: it gives a name to his thesis that a number of pro-war groups had coordinated a campaign to smear and destroy the anti-interventionist America First Committee. Flynn started out his pamphlet, The Smear Terror, with this admonition: "Would you believe that there are in this country several outfits that specialize in the destruction of reputations?"
Today, of course, such a declaration seems naïve: we all know about "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ," and, much to the dismay of Flynn's ghost, no doubt, the pattern runs true to form down through the years. Anyone who argues for a fundamental change in American foreign policy, away from interventionism and toward a more rational view of world affairs, is targeted – and destroyed.
This isn't about partisan politics and loyalties: the Smear Bund attacks Republicans as well as Democrats , as Ron Paul found out when [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. – that old [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. of interventionism – dug up some yellowed newsletters published under his name, which contained articles that didn't pass the political correctness test. Now, in fact, these infamous newsletters didn't print anything more toxic than your typical conservative Republican, circa 1980, might have written or believed: but no matter. The purveyors of this tripe didn't (and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ) care how many times, or how definitively the charge of "racism" is [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. – that the charge was raised at all, and that the howling accompanying this "discovery" reached a certain noise level, was all that mattered. Forever after, therefore, all Paul's opponents had to say was: "Isn't this the same Ron Paul who sanctioned ‘racism'?" And the argument, as far as the punditocracy is concerned, is over.
Now they're doing the same thing to Barack Obama. While his foreign policy prescriptions are a [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. radical departure from the interventionist norm than [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , Obama's chances of occupying the White House have the War Party seriously alarmed, and the word is going out: Get him!
The Reverend Jeremiah Wright is really a [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , and one is at a loss of what else to say about him, except that anyone who believes that the US government is responsible for the AIDS epidemic is certifiable, period. It matters not that some of his statements about US foreign policy being the moral equivalent of terrorism are [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. : because, in short, he doesn't matter. After all, he isn't running for the highest office in the land: Obama is. And if anyone on God's green earth is the complete antipode of Obama – in his temperament and demeanor, as well as his politics – then surely it is Wright.
This fact underscores the essence of the Smear Bund's methodology: the politics of distraction. Look over here, not over there! Forget about the war that is [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , and threatening to start multiple conflicts with [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , and various Lebanese [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. – just remember that Rev. Wright once said "####### America."
The really artful aspect of all this is the method of substitution occurring right before our eyes: they can't run against Obama, so they're running against Wright. Sure, they aren't the same person, but, you know, all those black people look – and think – alike. That, at any rate, is the crude racist assumption at the heart of the Smear Bund's strategy. The anti-Obama cabal is hoping the American people will look at these two wildly disparate individuals and perceive them as melting into each other.
Now Obama's got the old black leadership trying to tear him down, with [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. " [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. and [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. biting at his ankles: they're mortified that Obama's post-racial politics will render them irrelevant, and they're right about that.
Hutchinson manages to pull off one of the Smear Bund's favorite tactics: role reversal. It consists of projecting on to the victim the very characteristics that define the victimizers. So we get Hutchinson denouncing "Obama's Wright obsession." Obama, you see, has been spending too much time defending himself from these charges: he is the one who is obsessed with Wright, not the Smear Bund and the "mainstream" media (or do I repeat myself?).
What a laugh: every night we hear the same mantra coming out the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. -[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. -network news combine: Wright, Wright, Wright, like the droning of a cicada. And that, you see, is Obama's fault.
Divert, distract, demonize – that's the strategic vision of the War Party. As long as we're talking about the Rev. Wright, we don't get to talk about the war, including [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. with Iran. Let there be no doubt: it's Obama's foreign policy "deviationism" that has the Establishment running scared, and it's the neocons who are in the vanguard of the smear campaign. As Ha'aretz [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. the other day:
"The Republican Party's neoconservative clique is trawling archives for ‘anti-Israeli' essays by advisers who had been seen in Obama's staff. Robert Malley, who was President Bill Clinton's special assistant during the Camp David talks, joined Obama. The neoconservatives reached Malley's father, a Jew of Egyptian descent, who, alas, kept childhood ties with Yasser Arafat. Malley junior is accused of publishing a joint article with an Oslo-supporting Palestinian, in which they dared to argue that Ehud Barak played a major role in the Camp David summit's failure in July 2000."
They want desperately to engage Obama on this issue, because their whole strategy is meant to culminate in raising the specter of black anti-Semitism. That's what all this Wright-Farrakhan-"black extremist" brouhaha is about: they don't dare say that Obama is an anti-Semite, at this point. What they do say, however, is that he hangs out with anti-Semites. As Atlantic blogger [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. put it:
"First Obama was an anti-Semite because Zbigniew Brzezinski is an anti-Semite. Then Obama was an anti-semite because Robert Malley is an anti-semite. And now according to [Commentary's Noah] Pollak it's Samantha Power who's tainted by Jew-hatred."

With these folks, it always comes back to charges of "racism" and "extremism." Ron Paul = David Duke, and Obama = Farrakhan. And it always, always, always comes back to Israel. What has Israel's amen corner in the US up in arms about the prospect of President Obama is that he was capable of saying [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. :
"There is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, you're anti-Israel and that can't be the measure of our friendship with Israel. One of the things that struck me when I went to Israel was how much more open the debate was around these issues in Israel than they are sometimes here in the United States."
That he said it in front of a predominantly Jewish audience in Cleveland just makes his transgression all the more aggravating to [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. . No wonder they're scared witless.
This idea that the US must shield Israel from the [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. of its intransigence, its policy of [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. in the occupied territories, its [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. nuclear arsenal that hangs like a sword of Damocles over the Middle East, really exemplifies how American interests are ill-served by the "special relationship." Israel's [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. and heedlessness act [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , in the Middle East and around the world, and yet still we give them our unconditional support. Israeli military supremacy in the region and diplomatic hubris is the purest product of American hegemony, which is why US policy toward Israel is really the touchstone as far as the War Party is concerned. That is why Obama has been relentlessly grilled, and his advisors have been examined under a microscope, in regard to this issue.
Hillary Clinton, as far as the War Party is concerned, is the "safe" candidate: she came through for them with her recent remark that Iran ought to be "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ," while we [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. – and unnamed other countries in the region – with our nuclear shield. She doesn't care what she has to do in order to win, and if that means making Obama unelectable – well then, so be it. [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. , [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. – these are her new allies. Who's next – [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. ? What more confirmation do we need of my contention that both political parties in America are merely the "left" and "right" wings of the War Party?
If all else fails – the smears, the "mainstream" media barrage, the dirty tricks – the anti-Obama crowd can always bring out the really big guns. Those "[LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. " were put in place in order to make sure that the Democratic presidential candidate toes the War Party's line, and guarantees that the nominating process never strays very far from their iron grip. As I [LINK POSTED BY MEMBER] Only Members Can View This No Hillary For President Forum Link. of Obama in February: "They'll never let him become president." Unfortunately, it looks like I was right.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Anti Hillary Forum Replies Last Post
Obama Takes the Lead in Pennsylvania Herb Schaffler General Political Discussions 4 04.03.2008 06:07 PM
Obama Widens Lead Over Hillary Herb Schaffler 2008 Political Race - News 1 03.31.2008 06:30 PM
Obama Lead Evaporating nohil-billy Latest Hillary Clinton News 6 03.21.2008 07:39 AM
Obama Takes 13 Point Lead In California! Shock! WiseOne 2008 Political Race - News 0 02.05.2008 06:20 AM
Hillary Has 30 Point Lead Over Obama In California WiseOne Latest Hillary Clinton News 2 08.17.2007 10:22 AM


vBulletin style developed by Transverse Styles


vBulletin Forum Software, Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © 2007 - NO Hillary For President in 2008

No Hillary Clinton For President Forum Disclaimer: All content, information and opinions (collectively, the "Material") presented on Our Hillary Clinton Discussion Board at NoHillaryForPresident.com are those of the authors of posts and messages (collectively, the "participants") and not No Hillary For President. No Hillary For President does not guarantee the reliability, completeness, accuracy, timeliness or up-to-date-ness of the material presented on the No Hillary For President Forum. The material is published "as is," and does not represent the official views and opinions of No Hillary For President or any company. Any reliance upon the Material presented on these forums shall be at User's own risk. No Hillary Clinton For President does not review the substance of the content posted by users on these forums and is therefore not responsible for any of such content. No Hillary Clinton For President merely provides a space for its users to express and exchange their own opinions.


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO